Above: Meryl Ann Butler at the Women’s March in Norfolk, Virginia, with a sign she painted the day before.

Secret Life of Lady Liberty Authors
Laura E. Cortner & Dr. Bob Hieronimus
Interviewed for OpEdNews
by Meryl Ann Butler, 11/19/2017

Originally appeared on OpEdNews.

The Secret Life of Lady Liberty: Goddess in the New World by Robert R. Hieronimus, Ph.D., and Laura E. Cortner is a multifaceted tome exploring the missing piece — and missing peace — in American society: the power of the Feminine. Since the last major election cycle, the deadly imbalance in America’s toxic patriarchy has become unmistakable.

The US ranks 104th in women’s representation in government. Women and girls currently make up more than half the population in the US, but they’re represented by a Congress made up of 80 percent men. This isn’t just an issue in terms of equal representation — the proportion of women in government profoundly affects how all of society views women.

—Vox

Annually, four million people are drawn by the iconography of the symbol of the feminine to make the pilgrimage to Liberty Island to pay respects to America’s version of the Great Mother. And what inspires such yearning for the Lady with the torch? Can it be this lack of balance in American society and politics?

November 19, 2017 is the 130th anniversary of the death of Emma Lazarus, who is best known for her sonnet, “The New Colossus,” immortalized in a bronze plaque in the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty. The sonnet was written in 1883 when Lazarus was 34 years old, just four years before her death.

“The New Colossus”

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Emma Lazarus, 1883

OpEdNews is glad to welcome authors Robert R. Hieronimus, Ph.D., and Laura E. Cortner as our guests.

Robert R. Hieronimus, Ph.D. is an internationally known historian, visual artist, and radio host and has appeared on the History, Discovery, BBC, and National Geographic channels. The host of 21st Century Radio®, he lives in Maryland.

Laura E. Cortner has coauthored previous titles with Robert R. Hieronimus including Founding Fathers, Secret Societies; Inside the Yellow Submarine; and United Symbolism of America. She is the director of the Ruscombe Mansion Community Health Center for holistic services in Maryland.


Meryl Ann Butler: Thanks for visiting with OpEdNews, Laura and Dr. Bob! I really enjoyed your newest book, The Secret Life of Lady Liberty: Goddess in the New World. I was born in NYC, and have many memories of visiting the Statue of Liberty as a child. She has appeared in my artwork many times over the years, most recently as the poster I created to carry in the Women’s March.


Engraving of the Indian Queen entitled ‘America’ by Martin de Vos as engraved by Adriaen Collaert II ca.1595.
(Image by Public domain via wiki)
Permission Details DMCA

I’m so happy to feel her deep importance to this nation beginning to return. One of the most important “vacuums of the feminine” in America has to do with our structure of government. While we based it on the very successful model of the Iroquois Confederacy, what was left out of our Constitution was, in my opinion, the most important aspect of checks and balances. Can you speak about that?

Laura E. Cortner: Thanks Meryl Ann! This is one of our favorite topics and one of the reasons we wrote this book about the Statue of Liberty in the first place.

One of the biggest “secrets” about Lady Liberty that we are referring to in the title of our book is her Native American ancestry. This is evident symbolically and from an art history standpoint when you examine the images of the so-called Indian Queen on the earliest European travel literature of the late 1500s.


Illustrates the Iroquois influence theory, and how closely the U.S. self-governing structure mirrors that established by the League of Iroquois over 500 years earlier. Chart rendered by Amy Ford based on the concept in ‘The Great Law’
(Image by Amy Ford)
Permission Details DMCA

These European artists depicted the new land as a voluptuous, mostly naked, dark-skinned woman — and we can elaborate later, if you like, about how this “Indian Queen” image unconsciously continues to influence our domination paradigm in the United States even today, in terms of environmental stewardship. But what you’re pointing to with your first question is the missing element in the U.S. Constitution: namely, the voice of the Council of the Clan Mothers.

Our founders borrowed heavily from the Native governing structures they observed in their neighboring societies, in particular the League of the Iroquois. And when you compare the two governments side by side, U.S. and Iroquois, you can immediately see the esteemed position in which the Iroquois held their women.

The Council of the Clan Mothers among the Iroquois, or to more correctly name them, the Haudenosaunee, is on par with the U.S. Supreme Court. The wise women made all the most important decisions for their nation. The women determined when to go to war and when to negotiate peace; they were the ones who voted in the chiefs, and they held the power of impeachment; the women owned all the property and retained it in times of divorce, and on and on.

But though John Adams and others acknowledged their indebtedness to the Native Americans for inspiring the American Revolution and providing a framework for their new experiment in self-rule, Adams spoke for many when he voiced his fear of giving too much power to the women.

I’ll let Bob tell you what John Adams said in praise of the Iroquois, but here’s what he said in reply to Abigail Adams when she famously told him to “remember the ladies,” (i.e, women’s rights) when drafting this new declaration of independence they were all talking about. His reply to her was tongue-in-cheek, saying women are already so powerful that the men were at their feet. He joked that if in their declaration of independence from the King that they simultaneously freed the women from the centuries of legal repression that was preventing them from education and employment or even personhood, then they would face what he called the dreaded “petticoat revolution.” In other words, it scared him less to take on the King of England and his mighty army of redcoats and mercenaries than it did to change the laws that continued to suppress women’s equal access to full citizenship.

Dr. Bob Hieronimus: That’s right, and thanks for inviting us to this interview, Meryl Ann. Practically all of the founders we learn about in school wrote at one time or another about their praise for the governing methods of the Indians. John Adams said that the U.S. Constitution was the Americans’ attempt to “set up a government of . . . modern Indians.” That was in his Defence of the Constitutions in 1787.

Thomas Paine wrote, “To understand what the state of society ought to be, it is necessary to have some idea of the natural state of man, such as it is at this day among the Indians of North America. . . . [Poverty was a creation] of what is called civilized life. It exists not in the natural state. . . . The life of an Indian is a continual holiday compared to the poor of Europe.”


The reverse of the Great Seal of the United States
(Image by willc2)
Permission Details DMCA

This respect that our founders felt for the Native Americans is a subject that I always try to bring up whenever I’m being interviewed by the History Channel or the Discovery Channel or the many other shows I’ve done about the “secrets” of the founding fathers.

You know my doctoral dissertation is a humanistic and transpersonal interpretation of the Reverse of the Great Seal, that mysterious eye in the triangle over an unfinished pyramid.

Today, thanks to these many documentaries I’ve appeared on, most Americans THINK they know this symbol means “Illuminati” or “Freemasons” or worse, “Satanic.” That’s why I almost always refuse these interview requests any more. They will cut out the parts when I’m talking about the influence of the League of the Iroquois and how much we owe to them, and they will leave in all the edited bits from my symbolic analysis of the Great Seal or the layout of Washington, DC, that links them however tenuously to the Freemasons. Oftentimes what I say will be skewed into whatever conspiracy theory they are trying to spin for whatever ratings season they are in.

Personally, I find it far more fascinating to focus on the convincing evidence of the influence of the Native Americans on the founding fathers. This research has been collected by dozens of scholars such as Roy Fadden, John Mohawk, Bruce Johansen, Donald Grinde, Oren Lyons and more.


Contemporary image based on oral traditions of how the Ancestors influenced the Founding Fathers.
(Image by By Iroquois artist John Kahionhes Fadden, Director of the Six Nations Museum, NY)
Permission Details DMCA

For crying out loud, the Indians were right there with all the famous men in that hot building in Philadelphia in the pivotal summer of 1776. They were right there! The Second Continental Congress actually invited them to observe their debates over independence and give their feedback.

In May and June of 1776 twenty-one Iroquois sachems camped out in the room above Congress on the second floor, and Secretary of the Congress Charles Thomson, himself an adopted member of the Delaware Indians and whose Indian name translated to “Man Who Tells the Truth,” recorded their visit in detail in the official minutes for the Congress.

MAB: Wow, Bob I never learned that in American History class! That’s enlightening!

BH: Right! But that’s not all. At the end of this observation period, they gave John Hancock, the president of the Congress, an Indian name, Karanduan, or the Great Tree, likening him to their own Great Law of Peace, the central hub around which all their laws radiated.

And you’re absolutely right in terms of what they left out. We believe the main reason that the Iroquois system of the Great Law of Peace survived for hundreds of years (successfully maintaining peace between sovereign nations), and the U.S. system has only marginally succeeded over the past two hundred years (going to war at least once a decade and providing unequal opportunity for health and security of its citizens) is the missing element of the clan system and their value for the power of women.

The Iroquois acknowledged that men and women had different strengths, but considered them equally powerful. In fact, due to their quite different creation stories, they considered women more powerful than men in many ways, and would never dream of attempting any action without their guidance.

MAB: I agree about women being more powerful. As an example, there is a video on social media which shows a couple of men who get hooked up to a labor pain simulator because they want to prove that their wives exaggerated the pain of childbirth. Of course, they begged for mercy as their wives high-fived each other!

And that is only one of the ways in which women are stronger than men. Also, women are typically more apt to want to cooperate and they are less inclined to let testosterone-induced competitiveness push them into war.

In Michael Moore’s film “Where to Invade Next,” he interviewed the women who ran the only Icelandic bank that survived the country’s famous financial collapse. Here’s the clip in which they explain why they believe a women’s bank succeeded:

It seems that a generous application of the feminine perspective can be healthy for humanity. Do you see any ways that we can get back to more of the feminine influences here in the US? Can the archetype of Lady Liberty help us?